ENNO

Ambition should run on intelligence, not exhaustion.

When intelligence scales with compute, an intelligent and hard-working team is no longer enough.

Most companies still treat AI as a procurement question. Which licences to buy, which copilot to roll out, which agent to pilot, and so on. It often isn't landing. Teams get the tools and the P&L doesn't move; some scale the investments back. The reason isn't the tools themselves. It's that the data underneath them is scattered, unconnected, and undocumented except in people's heads. Intelligence lacks the solid foundation it needs to produce good judgement.

But there's a deeper shift underneath the disappointment. The last great change, cloud, drove the cost of memory toward zero. The companies that understood it didn't just save on storage; they rebuilt around abundant memory and turned it into an advantage. The same dynamic is now being applied to intelligence.

The cost of generating an answer is collapsing. The cost of owning a decision is not.

Cost per unit of capability · log scaleTime since the shift began →$500,000 per GBstorage · 1983$0.02 per GBtoday · four decades later$30 per M tokensintelligence · 2023$0.15 per M tokenstrending further down · 2026Storage · decadesIntelligence · ~3 years

Many companies are defending a moat made of exactly the thing that's about to get cheap: the processing and pattern-matching they currently hire people to do by hand.

Intelligence is becoming abundant. It is no longer a moat on its own.

What can't be commoditised is the foundation intelligence runs on: data that's connected, that compounds as it's used, and an organisation set up to make and own good decisions on top of it.

I believe this is the future.

Product GraphCustomer GraphVector GraphEmployee GraphManagerjudgement, applied and returnedAgents · machine intelligencePeopleInformation

Why we exist

This is why I decided to start building Nyberg Advisory. I have spent my entire career helping fast-growing companies, and I have watched good people burn out working to hold broken operating models together by hand, spreadsheet, duct tape, and a not insignificant amount of faith alone. That is especially true in places where labour is expensive, people are hard to replace, and the operation still runs on whoever happens to know how. I even burned out myself doing the same thing. That exhaustion isn't just a human cost. It's the sign of a model that lacks sustainability.

The better version isn't people working harder against the friction. It's foundations that let intelligence, human and machine, compound, and people freed to do the one thing that's becoming more valuable, not less: making decisions that you can own.

Vision

A future of work where extraordinary ambition is fuelled by intelligence, not exhaustion.

Mission

To rewire the operational architecture of ambitious organisations, removing the friction from daily execution so teams can achieve extraordinary results with sustainable effort.

I've spent around fifteen years watching companies absorb technology shifts. I sat at the front lines of the mobile revolution at Google and LinkedIn. I saw data and cloud transform the internet itself at Precis, where I spent a decade helping it become the successful international agency it is today. The pattern for business is familiar by now: the technological shift looks optional right up until it isn't.

If you want to know more about me, check out my LinkedIn

The above is my underlying thesis, which I aim to keep exploring and testing in public, through a publication I call Rewired.

Håvard Nyberg, Managing Director & Partner

If any of this resonates, let's talk.